nedfix — Built clean. Yours to keep. The developer who doesn't lock you in.

# problem

For when you have an idea that doesn't exist yet — a customer-facing product, an internal tool that off-the-shelf software can't quite do, or a piece that lives inside a larger system. Off-the-shelf options either don't fit or compromise the thing you're trying to build.

# approach

nedfix takes it from sketch to live deployment — architecture, schema, screens, integrations, and the written guides that let the next person pick up where the work ends. Default tools are proven choices: Next.js, TypeScript, PostgreSQL. New projects shouldn't be experiments at your expense.

# what you get

• ─Production-ready application, deployed and documented
• ─Database schema designed around how the business actually works
• ─Third-party integrations built and tested
• ─Handoff documentation a future engineer can pick up
• ─30-day post-launch support included
• ─Source code, infrastructure, and accounts in your name

# problem

Selling across more than one place — your own store plus regional marketplaces — means three different inventory truths, three commission structures, three return flows. Off-the-shelf platforms struggle once you scale beyond a single channel.

# approach

Build the storefront and the operational layer underneath it as one system — a single source of truth for inventory, pricing, returns, and reporting. Maps cleanly to each marketplace at the integration boundary. Works on Shopify, on regional marketplaces (Trendyol, Hepsiburada, others), and on fully custom backends when off-the-shelf platforms can't keep up.

# what you get

• ─Storefront and operational layer built as one system
• ─Single source of truth for inventory, pricing, and returns
• ─Marketplace integrations — Shopify, Trendyol, Hepsiburada, custom
• ─One reconciled view of the business at month-end
• ─Available as fixed-scope build or ongoing monthly partnership
• ─30-day post-launch support included

# problem

Operations have outgrown spreadsheets and copy-pasted SaaS. The team has custom rules — commission engines, sales pipelines, inventory flows, multi-channel reporting — that don't fit any off-the-shelf product. Reporting requires hours of manual stitching across systems that don't talk to each other.

# approach

Design the data model around how the team actually works, not around what a SaaS vendor decided was generic enough to sell. Build the screens to mirror the existing operational flow so adoption doesn't require retraining. Build tolerant import tooling for whatever data is locked in legacy systems.

# what you get

• ─Data model built around the team's actual workflow
• ─Screens that mirror existing flow — adoption without retraining
• ─Tolerant import tooling for data locked in legacy systems
• ─Reporting that runs in the system, not across spreadsheets
• ─One operational source of truth across the business
• ─30-day post-launch support included

# problem

Agencies, studios, and professional practices need a site where the writing, typography, and structure carry as much weight as the engineering. Generic templates undercut the work. Slow sites undercut the brand. Most existing solutions force a tradeoff between custom design and ease of editing.

# approach

A custom CMS so the team can publish without dev involvement. Multilingual from day one when the audience needs it. Performance treated as part of the brand: nothing slow, nothing bloated. Each project page can be a single editorial column — not a template applied uniformly.

# what you get

• ─Custom CMS the team can publish from without dev involvement
• ─Multilingual from day one when the audience needs it
• ─Editorial-grade typography and structure, not template-applied
• ─Performance treated as part of the brand — nothing slow, nothing bloated
• ─Source code, infrastructure, and accounts in your name
• ─30-day post-launch support included

# problem

A project lost its lead developer, a system slowed down as it grew, data stopped flowing between tools, or you inherited code from someone who's no longer reachable. Off-the-shelf consultancies bid on stabilization before they understand what's broken — so the bid is wrong.

# approach

Starts with a paid code review — written assessment, prioritized list of what's broken, and a proposed scope to stabilize. Most reviews take 5 days. The review fee is credited against the engagement if the work continues into a full project.

# what you get

• ─Written assessment with prioritized list of what's broken
• ─Proposed scope to stabilize, with actual numbers
• ─60-minute walkthrough call to talk through findings
• ─Review fee credited toward stabilization if the work continues
• ─Clear diagnosis you can act on — even if you go elsewhere